Editorial Team

Asoc.Prof. Nazmi Xhomara

Lecturer at Department of Mathematics and Statistics, "Luarasi" University

Call: +355 68 201 8960

Email: nazmi.xhomara@luarasi-univ.edu.al

Prof.Dr. Darko Petkovic

Professor in the field of Production Systems, Technologies and Entrepreneurship

Call: + 387 62 330 103

Email: dpetkovic@mf.unze.ba

Ekrem Halimovski. PhD Candidate

Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, FON University

Call: 02 244 55 55

Email: ekrem.halimovski@fon.edu.mk

Nikola Zečević , MSc

Nikola Zečević, MSc, Faculty of Humanistic Studies, Donja Gorica University, Montenegro

Call: +382 20 410 777

Email: nikola.zecevic@udg.edu.me

Asoc.Prof. Nazmi Xhomara

Lecturer at Department of Mathematics and Statistics, "Luarasi" University

Nazmi Xhomara graduated on science teaching in 1988. As he was passionate about scientific research he obtained a Master Degree on “Research on Education” in 2012, and a Doctoral degree on “Education Sciences/Pedagogy” in 2015. He published schoolbooks as well as scientific papers. He is lecturing currently Policy on Education, Leadership and Management of Education, Curriculum, and Research Methods courses at University.

  1. 2021

    Associate Professor

    University of Tirana
  2. 2012 - 2015

    Doctor of Philosophy, Pedagogy

    University of Tirana
  3. 2010 -2012

    Master's Degree, Education, MND

    University of Tirana

Editorial Assessment and Peer Review Process

Scholarly peer review in scientific journals is a quality control mechanism, where an author’s scholarly work, research, or ideas are subjected to a critical evaluation undertaken by experts specializing in the related area, prior to publication in a journal or as a book. The peer review process ensures that the articles published, meet the accepted standards of the discipline. WBU Journal follows an initial editorial review process (pre-quality editorial assessment-PQA), where the experts first assess the manuscript for their overall quality and suitability for publication in the journal; based on this system of evaluation, manuscripts are then accepted or rejected, followed by a double-blinded peer review process, which means that the confidentiality of both the reviewer and author identities are maintained, such that neither the author nor the reviewer details are disclosed throughout the review process. To facilitate this, authors are advised to ensure that the author details and blinded manuscript without the author details are submitted as two separate files.

Double blinded peer review process

Manuscript Submission

  • Submission via online portal or e-mail
  • Cover letter, author and co-author details and manuscript
    (separate files)

Pre- Quality Editorial Assessment (PQA) Check

  • Plagiarism check (Note: plagiarized, fabricated or content unsuitable
    for the journal will be immediately rejected).
  • Language editing for brevity.
  • Ensuring that the manuscript structure includes the required sections.
  • Sent back to the author (SBTA) seeking an approval of the introduced

Peer Review

  • Double blinded peer review undertaken by expert researchers and academicians.
  • Revision done by authors on the basis of reviewer comments.
    (*revisions must be highlighted and accompanied by a letter in response to each comment by the reviewers)
  • Revised article: Accept/Reject/Re-revise.

EIC Decision

  • Re-checks the revised manuscript to ensure that it meets the journal standards
  • Final decision: Accept/Reject /Re-write and Re-submit

Copy Editing & Styling

  • Checking for the composition and organization (formatting) of the paper against the journal guidelines
  • Reference styling and proof corrections
  • Author’s confirmation of the final edited manuscript before publication
  • In this version, the author can create or suggest modifications in the content for use within the module


  • Accepted article is sent for generating the galley proof
  • Online publication of the manuscript